98.5% of members continue subscribing month after month.
How to Filter
Printable List
My early lessons didn’t even have objectives, let alone good objectives! Here’s how to build four-part, differentiated lesson objectives.
As a new teacher, I only knew one model of instruction: Direct Instruction. I was like a chef who only knew how to deep fry!
Ask students to go beyond “I don’t like it” and form critical opinions based on a set of criteria. Students can produce written arguments or turn their opinion into oral presentations.
How to memorize the countries in Africa, the Japanese writing system, or a deck of cards.
Take direction instruction beyond a monotonous practice of the same skill over and over.
Just because a task is “creative” doesn’t mean students are at the top of Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Giving a definition just doesn’t cut it! Use the Frayer Model to explain (and assess!) vocabulary.
A model of instruction that moves from specific examples to concepts to one big idea.
How to use a classic to revamp a study of context clues.
Why just “identifying patterns” isn’t deep enough.
In a Concept Attainment lesson, we give students examples and non-examples of a concept — without telling them what that concept is!
While “engagement” is fun, it shouldn’t be our main goal.
Who would win in the Tournament of Least Useful Geometric Shapes or Bravest Shakespearean Characters? Create an academic tournament and watch your students’ brains sweat!
A big, impressive product doesn’t mean that there was big, impressive thinking.
A delightfully ambiguous framework that is quick to prepare, but can last forever!
Rather than just learning about one structure, let’s climb Bloom’s and think more deeply.
Want your students to ask better questions? Why not train them to inquire!?
This math puzzle fell flat. Why? Because puzzling isn’t about difficulty — it’s about something else entirely.
So your students can identify a story’s problem and solution. Then what?
Here’s how one teacher uses inductive thinking to help students respond to literature.
After looking at dozens of lessons folks sent in, I came up with three big ideas to address.
Here’s how you can move from merely “summarizing a text” to a high-level task that culminates in synthesis.
What separates our on-level writers from our advanced writers?
Comparing fraction strategies? Let’s take it even further!
What separates difficulty from complexity? And why do complex tasks lead to much more natural differentiation?
Here’s a simple task that will add complexity to any content from any grade level!
A high level of thinking in math also requires the support of thoughtful scaffolding.
Learn to lead a lesson that is built entirely on student curiosity.
The word “Create” can mask low-level tasks. Here’s why I avoid using it in objectives.
With inductive thinking, students will work from parts to whole, discovering big ideas along the way!
Analyze is like a gateway that connects the lower- and higher-levels of Bloom’s. But make sure you’re truly asking an Analyze-level question!
Go beyond merely explaining strengths and weaknesses and get students thinking in interesting ways.
Rather than giving students rules to apply to websites, let them analyze websites to create rules.
What if your students designed your classroom layout?
What would it be like if students graphed characters from stories? Historic leaders? Elements from the period table? Objects in space?
