Serving advanced learners (and their teachers) since 2012.

The Frayer Model – A Tool To Explain Concepts

The Frayer Model was developed by Dorothy Frayer, Wayne Fredrick, and Herbert Klausmeier way back in 🎵 the summer of ’69 🎶. I first heard of this model through my pal David Chung. Here’s how it works.

Frayer Model is for Concepts

First, the Frayer Model is for teaching a concept, not isolated facts. A theme I’ve noticed in the work of education researchers in the 1960s was moving students toward thinking about concepts, not just facts. It’s amazing that, in the 21st century, we’re still struggling to move towards bigger, abstract thinking.

So, facts are isolated details. They’re easy to test on a multiple-choice exam!

Concepts are more abstract. They will contain facts and examples. Because they’re abstract, they’re difficult to define. You can’t directly draw a concept, but you could create a symbol.

So, while, yes, you can draw a specific planet, like Jupiter, you can’t draw “planet.” You can draw Asia, but you can’t draw “continent.”

Here’s how The Frayer Model helps students to fully understand a concept.

Four Pieces to Frayer

There are four pieces to the Frayer Model. When we introduce a concept to students, we will include:

It works for any concept, no matter the sophistication or content area. Here are three samples: “hero,” “lake,” and “prime number.” But you could use the Frayer Model to deeply understand concepts as wide-ranging as “quadratic equation” and “Shakespearean sonnet.”

Frayer Model for “Hero”

Frayer Model for “Lake”

Frayer Model for “Prime Number”

Other Uses for the Frayer Model

Now, the examples above were all typical school subjects, but you could use the Frayer Model to explain meta-topics. Create a Frayer Model for each of the prompts of Depth and Complexity.

Depth and Complexity tool of 🚦 Rules

Are you using a Universal Theme? The Frayer Model would be great for introducing Power, for example:

Universal Theme of 🏛️ Power

When I first learned of the Frayer Model, I saw David Chung use it to define disciplines in the “Think Like A…” framework. Summarizing one of his examples:

Think Like a 👓 Linguist

You could create a Frayer Model to explain class expectations (“courtesy,” “service,” or “conscientiousness” might be great concepts to define) or to define what, exactly, a “teacher” is – and what’s a “student”?

Wrap Up

Compare a complete Frayer Model to a mere definition and I’m sure you’ll see how powerful it is to offer essential characteristics, examples, and non-examples. Sometimes it even pushes me as the teacher to clarify what the concept really means!

Oh, and here’s a commonly used graphic organizer of the Frayer Model (PDF) to get your started.